Audyense·
Skip to content
Side-by-side record

ChartHop vs. Litmos

A side-by-side view of the product records we have today. Use it to narrow the question, then confirm current pricing, limits, and security details with each vendor.

The short version

ChartHop starts at $5 per seat, versus Litmos at $2,500. Litmos carries the higher aggregate rating (9.7/5 vs 4.3/5).

Full comparison

ChartHopfrom $5 per employee/mo
Litmosfrom $2,500 per month
Audyense Score62ASFair29AS*Low
PositioningStop reporting on your org. Start running it.Litmos is one of the leading corporate learning systems on the market built to accelerate training of both internal and external teams.
Free tierNoYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitSMB, Mid-market, EnterpriseStartup, SMB, Mid-market
Pricing plans
  • Core$5
  • HRIS module$4
  • Headcount Planning module$4
  • Compensation module$4
  • Performance module$4
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing
  • Free or entry planFree
  • Higher tiersCustom pricing
Time-off & PTO managementYesNative in the HRIS module — web + mobile time-off requests with manager approval—
Mobile appYesNative iOS and Android apps supporting time-off requests, forms, surveys, and reviews—
Reporting & dashboardsYesCore tier includes people analytics and board-ready dashboards—
PayrollNoSyncs with external payroll providers (ADP, Gusto, Paychex) rather than running payroll natively—
Benefits administrationNoNot documented as a native feature; platform is a data hub connecting to other systems—
Public APIYesREST API with scoped access controls—
Applicant tracking (ATS)PartialNo native ATS; integrates with Ashby, Greenhouse, Jobvite, and Lever—
Performance reviewsYesDedicated Performance module connects reviews, goals, and development conversations—
Employee onboardingYesHRIS module includes custom onboarding/offboarding workflows—
Employee directory & org chartYesEmployee profiles, org chart, and directory views in the base Core tier—
Embedded content creation tools that support multiple formats—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Intuitive user interface—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Multi-language & localization support—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Surveys—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Custom branding / Whitelabel—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Assessment / Quiz—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Sell online courses—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Ecommerce shopping cart—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
SCORM & TIN CAN certified—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Schedule live courses – ILT—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Real-time reporting—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Developer API including SalesForce—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Okta—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
and Dropbox—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Integrations verified15+—
Aggregate rating4.3 · 166 reviews9.7 · No reviews yet
Integrations
WorkdayADP Workforce NowADP RunBambooHRGustoPaylocity+9 more
—
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type II
—
Pros
  • Intuitive, easy-to-use interface with strong data visualization (dynamic org charts, real-time insights)
  • Effective centralization of employee data in one place
  • Strong customer support quality
  • Good for organizational transparency — viewing structure, locations, and reporting lines
  • Independent review documents a concrete business workflow
  • Documented capability: Embedded content creation tools that support multiple formats
  • Documented capability: Intuitive user interface
  • Documented capability: Multi-language & localization support
  • Documented capability: Surveys
Cons
  • Org chart navigation can feel disorienting — zooms/moves too easily for some users
  • Onboarding and initial setup is lengthy, and customization can require coding knowledge
  • Not the most budget-friendly option relative to competitors
  • Occasional syncing delays between ChartHop and integrated payroll/HRIS tools
  • Pricing and usage limits should be checked against the exact plan
  • Implementation effort depends on the team's data and process maturity
  • Reported outcomes should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit ChartHop ↗Visit Litmos ↗

Editorial read of this comparison

The table summarizes structured facts; this section explains what the differences mean for a real buying decision.

Where each tool fits, and where it may not

ChartHop

ChartHop is an AI-powered people-operations platform that unifies people, financial, and business data in one system, giving HR and Finance teams a live, visual org chart layered with headcount planning, compensation, and performance modules instead of static spreadsheets.

A particularly good fit for: Mid-market companies (roughly 51–1,000 employees), which make up the majority of reviewers HR and People-ops teams that want org design, headcount planning, and people analytics unified with real workforce data Companies already using established payroll/HRIS/ATS systems (Workday, ADP, Gusto, Greenhouse, etc.) who want a data layer on top rather than a payroll replacement

May be a poor fit if: Companies wanting an all-in-one payroll processor — ChartHop does not run payroll itself, only syncs with external providers Very small teams or budget-constrained buyers, since per-module per-employee pricing stacks up quickly once HRIS/Comp/Performance modules are added

Litmos

Litmos is one of the leading corporate learning systems on the market built to accelerate training of both internal and external teams. It won our Expert’s Choice Award for 2019. Despite being able to automate both internal and external learning programs, Litmos is still referred to as the worlds simplest and easiest to use a learning management system that requires neither dedicated training nor expensive installations. The company’s target group entails mostly midmarket companies and established enterprises, while its client base already lists a number of prominent Fortune 1000 members. The system, nevertheless, is not entirely focused on large and corporate teams – Litmos still belongs to the group of affordable eLearning systems with dedicated ‘up to 100 users’ packages a small company could consider. In fact, Litmos is often preferred to seemingly cheaper LMS tools because it doesn’t require a setup fee and doesn’t limit on-point customer support to a particular plan. The price will rather depend on how many users you wish to involve, and the type of learning support you wish to focus on. To make the process of attaining and selling courses even smoother, Litmos established a number of valuable third-party partnerships with platforms such as Shopify (you can distribute your Litmos courses there for free). Needless to say, a vast group of integrations is a guarantee that the system will blend in with your software ecosystem, and won’t require you to make any specific changes in order to run it. Litmos integrates with Salesforce to increase sales reps performance, train licensed users, and leverage training for customers, employees, and compliance, among others. Next to its convenient Salesforce partnership, Litmos works impeccably with Okta, OneLogin, Ping, Box, Centrify, and other similar systems, and it is one of the few SCORM certified learning & security

A particularly good fit for: B2B teams evaluating HR and People software Teams that need documented workflow capabilities and fit guidance Organizations willing to validate implementation and plan limits

May be a poor fit if: Teams seeking a workflow outside the product's documented focus Teams needing unlimited usage without plan limits

Pricing and plan structure

ChartHop: Published starting price $5 per employee/mo

  • Core$5 per employee/mo
  • HRIS module$4 per employee/mo (add-on)
  • Headcount Planning module$4 per employee/mo (add-on)
  • Compensation module$4 per employee/mo (add-on)
  • Performance module$4 per employee/mo (add-on)
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing

Litmos: Published starting price $2,500 per month

  • Free or entry planFree
  • Higher tiersCustom pricing

Capabilities worth validating

  • ChartHop: Time-off & PTO management, Mobile app, Reporting & dashboards, Public API, Applicant tracking (ATS) Integrations include Workday, ADP Workforce Now, ADP Run, BambooHR.
  • Litmos: Embedded content creation tools that support multiple formats, Intuitive user interface, Multi-language & localization support, Surveys, Custom branding / Whitelabel

Questions to answer before switching

  • Does ChartHop's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does Litmos's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does the exact integration path for Workday, ADP Workforce Now, ADP Run support the sync direction, permissions, and volume we need?
  • Is a hosted-only deployment acceptable for the team and customers who will use this system?

How to evaluate this shortlist

A useful comparison turns the differences between HR & People tools into a concrete test. Use these steps to avoid choosing from a feature table or the lowest headline price alone.

  1. Start with a representative HR & People workflow, not a feature checklist. Define who will use it, what data goes in, and what outcome the team needs.
  2. Test the complete path through Workday, ADP Workforce Now, ADP Run: permissions, sync direction, failure handling, and volume limits often matter more than the integration name.
  3. Compare the cost of the real scenario, including users, usage, storage, support, and contract requirements. The entry price alone does not measure adoption cost.
  4. Before switching, list the evidence gaps, request a demo of the critical workflow, and confirm security, data residency, export, and support with each vendor.

Structured signals help narrow the shortlist, but a trial with a real workflow is still the best way to validate the decision.

Research basis

Last checked: 2026-08-18. Pricing, integrations, feature support, and review signals can change, so treat this as a research snapshot and verify the final decision with the vendor.

Sources consulted: ChartHop product site, G2, Capterra; Litmos product site, FinancesOnline review, Vendor website