Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Centralize vs. Fathom

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus Centralize at $500.

Full comparison

Centralizefrom $500 per month
Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Audyense Score33AS*Low76AS*Strong
PositioningCentralize is an AI-powered tool for relationship selling.Free AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitMid-market, EnterpriseStartup, SMB, Mid-market
Pricing plans
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • GrowthCustom pricing
  • Team$15
See who you’ve engagedYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Analyze stakeholder prioritiesYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Pinpoint multithreading coverage gapsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Uncover missing decision-makersYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Auto-assemble account insightsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Receive job change alertsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Lead generationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichmentYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Email outreachYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Account researchYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified6+
Aggregate rating · No reviews yet5.0 · 6.9k reviews
Integrations
SalesforceCloseSlackMakeLinkedInAPI
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Documented capability: See who you’ve engaged
  • Documented capability: Analyze stakeholder priorities
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Centralize is recommended for sales teams and leaders who want clear visibility into deals, multithreading, and warm introductions. Companies like Hig
  • Public profile names Salesforce, Close, Slack as connected workflow surfaces
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
Cons
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
Visit Centralize ↗Visit Fathom ↗