Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Cakewalk vs. Tines

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Cakewalk starts at Custom pricing per seat, versus Tines at Custom pricing.

Full comparison

Cakewalkfrom Custom pricing
Tinesfrom Custom pricing
Audyense Score57ASFair22AS*Low
PositioningAccess Management For Your AI Agents And HumansNo-code workflow automation for security and IT teams
Free tierNoNo
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitSMB, Mid-marketMid-market, Enterprise
Pricing plans
  • PlatformCustom pricing
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing
Audit logsYesGenerates granular, auditor-designed logs covering every access request/decision as a single system of record.
Compliance reportingYesAccess-control evidence and request logs are built to support ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIS2, HIPAA, and PCI audits.
Device managementNoNo MDM/device-management capability found; product scope is application/identity access, not endpoint devices.
Multi-factor authenticationNoMFA is handled by the connected identity provider (e.g. Okta, Entra); Cakewalk itself does not enforce MFA directly.
Privileged access managementPartialProvides credential vaulting and just-in-time, scoped token mediation for AI agent tool calls, but not full human-privileged-session PAM.
Public APIYesDedicated Open API for building custom workflows and integrations.
Role-based access controlYesRole- and attribute-based access control (RBAC/ABAC) for automated group assignment.
SCIM / directory provisioningPartialAuto-provisioning via direct IdP sync (Okta, Entra, Google Workspace) and 5,600+ app connectors; SCIM as a protocol not explicitly named.
Self-hosting / on-premNoAWS-hosted, multitenant cloud SaaS with EU-only data residency; no self-hosted option offered.
SSO / SAMLYesIntegrates with SSO identity providers including Okta, Google Workspace, and Microsoft Entra.
Visual workflow builderYesBuilds workflows without traditional application code.
Security automationYesAutomates alert, enrichment, and response processes.
IT automationYesConnects identity, ticketing, and operational tasks.
API integrationsYesConnects any system with a usable API.
WebhooksYesReceives and sends event-driven workflow data.
ApprovalsYesAdds human checks to higher-risk automations.
Reusable componentsYesStandardizes common automation patterns.
Audit and governanceYesSupports controlled, reviewable automation operations.
Integrations verified15+
Aggregate rating4.9 · 28 reviews · No reviews yet
Integrations
OktaGoogle WorkspaceMicrosoft Entra IDSlackMicrosoft TeamsBambooHR+9 more
OktaMicrosoft Entra IDGoogle WorkspaceSlackMicrosoft TeamsJira+9 more
Security & compliance
GDPRISO 27001SOC 2 (audit-ready)
SOC 2ISO 27001GDPR
Pros
  • Covers both human and AI-agent access governance in one product
  • Rated easier to set up/administer than IAM alternatives in reviews
  • Slack-based self-service access requests
  • Flexible API and webhook connectivity
  • Security-specific workflow patterns
  • Reusable visual automation
  • Good audit and control story
Cons
  • Small review sample size (28 on G2)
  • Pricing not published; newer/smaller company than legacy IAM vendors
  • Pricing is quote-based
  • Automation design needs governance
  • Complex workflows can become hard to maintain
  • Value depends on enough repeatable work
Visit Cakewalk ↗Visit Tines ↗