Audyense·
Side-by-side record

Browserable vs. Starnus

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Browserable starts at $26 per seat, versus Starnus at $50.

Full comparison

Browserablefrom $26 per month
Starnusfrom $50 EUR per month (Pro)
Audyense Score32AS*Low44AS*Low
PositioningBrowserable is an open-source browser automation tool for AI agents.AI SDR platform that runs outbound prospecting, enrichment, outreach, and follow-ups on autopilot.
Free tierYesNo
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMBStartup, SMB, Mid-market
Pricing plans
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
  • Pro$50
  • Pro+$125
  • Ultra$250
  • Managed Service$900
Self-hostableYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Open sourceYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Easy integrationYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
State-of-the-art browser agentYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Build browser agentsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Extract information efficientlyYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai Agent BuildersYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Browser Automation ToolsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified3+
Aggregate rating · No reviews yet5.0 · 2 reviews
Integrations
MakeLinkedInAPI
SmartleadUnipileHubSpotPerplexity
Security & compliance
Pros
  • Documented capability: Self-hostable
  • Documented capability: Open source
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Browserable is recommended for developers who want to build browser agents that can navigate sites, fill out forms, and extract information easily. It
  • Public profile names Make, LinkedIn, API as connected workflow surfaces
  • Fast automated ICP and prospect-list generation
  • Combines email and LinkedIn outreach in one flow
  • Cheaper than enterprise AI-SDR alternatives
Cons
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
  • No independent review-platform rating found to verify real-world satisfaction
  • Credit-based limits on leads/messages per tier
Visit Browserable ↗Visit Starnus ↗