Audyense·
Side-by-side record

BrandMentions vs. Fathom

Built from each tool’s researched, reviewed record. Figures are checked against public pricing pages at research time — always confirm current pricing with the vendor before buying.

The short version

Fathom starts at $15 per seat, versus BrandMentions at $79.

Full comparison

BrandMentionsfrom $79 per month
Fathomfrom $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Audyense Score32AS*Low76AS*Strong
PositioningBrandMentions is a smart social listening and brand monitoring tool.Free AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet
Free tierYesYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitStartup, SMB, EnterpriseStartup, SMB, Mid-market
Pricing plans
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$249
  • Starter$249
  • BusinessCustom pricing
  • Team$15
Brand monitoringYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Reputation managementYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Competitor spyingYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Media monitoringYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Business intelligenceYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Social listening and analyticsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Account researchYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Social ListeningYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Apis Social Media AnalyticsYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Social Media Monitoring ApisYesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integrations verified4+
Aggregate rating · No reviews yet5.0 · 6.9k reviews
Integrations
LinkedInFacebookTwitterAPI
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Documented capability: Brand monitoring
  • Documented capability: Reputation management
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: BrandMentions is recommended for growing companies that want to track billions of mentions and never miss critical brand or product updates online. It
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter as connected workflow surfaces
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
Cons
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
Visit BrandMentions ↗Visit Fathom ↗