Audyense·
Skip to content
Side-by-side record

360Learning vs. Litmos

A side-by-side view of the product records we have today. Use it to narrow the question, then confirm current pricing, limits, and security details with each vendor.

The short version

360Learning starts at $8 per seat, versus Litmos at $2,500. Litmos carries the higher aggregate rating (9.7/5 vs 4.6/5).

Full comparison

360Learningfrom $8 per user/month
Litmosfrom $2,500 per month
Audyense Score81ASStrong29AS*Low
PositioningThe AI-driven LMS built to drive proprietary expertiseLitmos is one of the leading corporate learning systems on the market built to accelerate training of both internal and external teams.
Free tierNoYes
DeploymentCloud / SaaSCloud / SaaS
Best fitSMB, Mid-market, EnterpriseStartup, SMB, Mid-market
Pricing plans
  • Team$8
  • BusinessCustom pricing
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing
  • Free or entry planFree
  • Higher tiersCustom pricing
Public APIYesPublic API v2 for data export to BI/CRM tools—
Reporting & dashboardsYesBuilt-in analytics dashboards with exportable reports—
Mobile appYesNative iOS/Android app for course-taking and manager analytics—
Applicant tracking (ATS)NoNot an ATS — no candidate pipeline features—
Employee onboardingPartialStrong onboarding training via role-based learning paths triggered by HRIS sync, but no paperwork/e-signing/IT-provisioning workflows—
PayrollNoNo payroll functionality — integrates with payroll/HRIS platforms instead—
Time-off & PTO managementNoNot found in product documentation—
Benefits administrationNoNot found in product documentation—
Performance reviewsNoNo dedicated performance-appraisal module; has skills-gap analytics but not a formal review cycle tool—
Employee directory & org chartNoSyncs org data from HRIS for provisioning but doesn't offer its own directory/org-chart UI—
Embedded content creation tools that support multiple formats—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Intuitive user interface—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Multi-language & localization support—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Surveys—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Custom branding / Whitelabel—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Assessment / Quiz—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Sell online courses—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Ecommerce shopping cart—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
SCORM & TIN CAN certified—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Schedule live courses – ILT—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Real-time reporting—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Developer API including SalesForce—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Okta—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
and Dropbox—YesDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Integrations verified87+—
Aggregate rating4.6 · 585 reviews9.7 · No reviews yet
Integrations
SlackMicrosoft TeamsZoomSalesforceWorkdayBambooHR+9 more
—
Security & compliance
SOC 2 Type IIISO 27001GDPRCCPA/CPRA
—
Pros
  • Fast, easy course creation that lets non-instructional-designers build content
  • Strong collaborative, peer-driven authoring (comments, upvotes) that drives learner engagement
  • Responsive, well-regarded customer support
  • Useful learning analytics and dashboards for tracking completion
  • Independent review documents a concrete business workflow
  • Documented capability: Embedded content creation tools that support multiple formats
  • Documented capability: Intuitive user interface
  • Documented capability: Multi-language & localization support
  • Documented capability: Surveys
Cons
  • Steep learning curve and confusing navigation, partly due to platform-specific vocabulary
  • Limited customization options for the learning experience
  • Some admin and content features requested by users ship slowly
  • Feels feature-limited outside core authoring and delivery for some reviewers
  • Pricing and usage limits should be checked against the exact plan
  • Implementation effort depends on the team's data and process maturity
  • Reported outcomes should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visit 360Learning ↗Visit Litmos ↗

Editorial read of this comparison

The table summarizes structured facts; this section explains what the differences mean for a real buying decision.

Where each tool fits, and where it may not

360Learning

360Learning is an AI-powered LMS that lets subject-matter experts author and co-create courses collaboratively, rather than having content built top-down by L&D alone, turning internal expertise into just-in-time training for onboarding, compliance, and skills development.

A particularly good fit for: Mid-size to enterprise companies wanting subject-matter experts, not just L&D, to author training Organizations running onboarding, compliance, or partner/customer-education programs at scale Teams already using Slack, Teams, or an HRIS that want an LMS that plugs directly into that stack

May be a poor fit if: Very small teams or startups needing a bare-bones, cheap course tool — the Team plan still costs $8/user/month with a 100-user ceiling Organizations wanting a highly customizable or white-label learning UI, since reviewers cite limited customization

Litmos

Litmos is one of the leading corporate learning systems on the market built to accelerate training of both internal and external teams. It won our Expert’s Choice Award for 2019. Despite being able to automate both internal and external learning programs, Litmos is still referred to as the worlds simplest and easiest to use a learning management system that requires neither dedicated training nor expensive installations. The company’s target group entails mostly midmarket companies and established enterprises, while its client base already lists a number of prominent Fortune 1000 members. The system, nevertheless, is not entirely focused on large and corporate teams – Litmos still belongs to the group of affordable eLearning systems with dedicated ‘up to 100 users’ packages a small company could consider. In fact, Litmos is often preferred to seemingly cheaper LMS tools because it doesn’t require a setup fee and doesn’t limit on-point customer support to a particular plan. The price will rather depend on how many users you wish to involve, and the type of learning support you wish to focus on. To make the process of attaining and selling courses even smoother, Litmos established a number of valuable third-party partnerships with platforms such as Shopify (you can distribute your Litmos courses there for free). Needless to say, a vast group of integrations is a guarantee that the system will blend in with your software ecosystem, and won’t require you to make any specific changes in order to run it. Litmos integrates with Salesforce to increase sales reps performance, train licensed users, and leverage training for customers, employees, and compliance, among others. Next to its convenient Salesforce partnership, Litmos works impeccably with Okta, OneLogin, Ping, Box, Centrify, and other similar systems, and it is one of the few SCORM certified learning & security

A particularly good fit for: B2B teams evaluating HR and People software Teams that need documented workflow capabilities and fit guidance Organizations willing to validate implementation and plan limits

May be a poor fit if: Teams seeking a workflow outside the product's documented focus Teams needing unlimited usage without plan limits

Pricing and plan structure

360Learning: Published starting price $8 per user/month

  • Team$8 per user/month
  • BusinessCustom pricing
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing

Litmos: Published starting price $2,500 per month

  • Free or entry planFree
  • Higher tiersCustom pricing

Capabilities worth validating

  • 360Learning: Public API, Reporting & dashboards, Mobile app, Employee onboarding Integrations include Slack, Microsoft Teams, Zoom, Salesforce.
  • Litmos: Embedded content creation tools that support multiple formats, Intuitive user interface, Multi-language & localization support, Surveys, Custom branding / Whitelabel

Questions to answer before switching

  • Does 360Learning's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does Litmos's selected plan include the features and limits we need?
  • Does the exact integration path for Slack, Microsoft Teams, Zoom support the sync direction, permissions, and volume we need?
  • Is a hosted-only deployment acceptable for the team and customers who will use this system?

How to evaluate this shortlist

A useful comparison turns the differences between HR & People tools into a concrete test. Use these steps to avoid choosing from a feature table or the lowest headline price alone.

  1. Start with a representative HR & People workflow, not a feature checklist. Define who will use it, what data goes in, and what outcome the team needs.
  2. Test the complete path through Slack, Microsoft Teams, Zoom: permissions, sync direction, failure handling, and volume limits often matter more than the integration name.
  3. Compare the cost of the real scenario, including users, usage, storage, support, and contract requirements. The entry price alone does not measure adoption cost.
  4. Before switching, list the evidence gaps, request a demo of the critical workflow, and confirm security, data residency, export, and support with each vendor.

Structured signals help narrow the shortlist, but a trial with a real workflow is still the best way to validate the decision.

Research basis

Last checked: 2026-08-18. Pricing, integrations, feature support, and review signals can change, so treat this as a research snapshot and verify the final decision with the vendor.

Sources consulted: 360Learning product site, G2, Capterra; Litmos product site, FinancesOnline review, Vendor website