Audyense
Airtable
Gestión de proyectos · www.airtable.com
Resumen
Airtable is a cloud no-code platform that combines a relational database with spreadsheet-style editing, letting teams model projects as linked records and view the same data as a grid, kanban board, calendar, timeline or Gantt chart. Around that core it layers automations, scripting, Interfaces for stakeholder-facing dashboards, and Airtable AI agents. It is sold per editor seat across Free, Team, Business and Enterprise Scale plans, with record, attachment and automation-run caps rising at each tier.
El problema que resuelve Airtable
Project trackers usually start life as a shared spreadsheet and break the moment work needs to be linked, filtered per audience and kept current automatically. Airtable addresses that by making the tracker a relational database with linked records, then rendering it as whichever view each audience needs and automating the busywork between updates. The trade-off buyers report is that structure and scheduling rigour have to be built by hand, and that capacity limits and per-editor pricing become the real constraint as the tracker grows.
Contexto para decidir
Usa estos puntos para comprobar si el producto encaja con tu operación, no solo con la lista de funciones.
- Precio de entrada publicado: Free. Confirma límites de usuarios, uso y funciones por plan.
- Despliegue: cloud. Comprueba requisitos de seguridad, residencia de datos y acceso para todos los equipos que lo utilizarán.
- Integraciones verificadas: Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, Jira, Zendesk, Gmail. Valida el sentido de sincronización y los límites del plan elegido.
- La ficha se comprobó por última vez el 31/7/2026; los precios y las funciones pueden cambiar.
Cómo evaluar Airtable
Una ficha ayuda a crear una lista corta; una prueba con el flujo real del equipo decide si la herramienta encaja. Usa esta lectura junto con los datos estructurados y confirma cualquier cambio con el proveedor.
Encaje de flujo
El registro la considera especialmente adecuada para Ops, marketing and creative teams that have outgrown spreadsheet project trackers and want a relational base with automations behind them, Cross-functional projects where the same records must be read as a board, a calendar and a timeline by different audiences, Teams that need many read-only stakeholders on a project view, since only editors are billed on Team and Business plans. Comprueba que ese contexto coincide con el volumen, los roles y los procesos que debe soportar tu equipo.
Preguntas del piloto
- ¿Puede Airtable completar el flujo crítico sin trabajo manual fuera de la herramienta?
- ¿Las conexiones registradas (Slack, Google Drive, Salesforce, Jira) cubren el sentido de sincronización, los permisos y el volumen que necesitamos?
- ¿Qué límites de usuarios, uso, almacenamiento, soporte o seguridad aparecen después del precio inicial?
Evidencia y vigencia
Esta ficha se comprobó el 31/7/2026. La fecha indica cuándo se revisó el registro, no una garantía de que el proveedor no haya cambiado sus condiciones después.
Ideal para
- Ops, marketing and creative teams that have outgrown spreadsheet project trackers and want a relational base with automations behind them
- Cross-functional projects where the same records must be read as a board, a calendar and a timeline by different audiences
- Teams that need many read-only stakeholders on a project view, since only editors are billed on Team and Business plans
No encaja si
- Teams that need rigorous critical-path scheduling, native subtasks, baselines and resource-capacity planning out of the box — Airtable expects you to build that yourself
- Large contributor pools or high-volume trackers on a tight budget, where per-editor seat cost and per-base record caps compound fast
Por qué está listada
- One of the most widely adopted ways teams build custom project trackers without a developer, with a genuinely free tier to start on.
- Ships native Gantt, timeline, kanban and calendar views over the same relational dataset, so a single project base serves planners, doers and executives.
- Belongs in a project-management shortlist as the flexible-database option — buyers routinely weigh it against dedicated PM tools, and the trade-offs are well documented.
Precios
Free
FreeEntry tier for individuals and very small teams building lightweight trackers.
- Unlimited bases
- 1,000 records per base
- 1GB attachment space per base
- 100 automation runs per month
- Public forms and 14-day revision history
- 500 AI credits per user per month; up to 5 editors and 50 commenters
Team
$20 per seat / month billed annuallyFirst paid tier, adding real capacity plus the paid-only Gantt and timeline views.
- Unlimited bases
- 50,000 records per base
- 20GB attachment space per base
- 25,000 automation runs per month
- 1-year revision and snapshot history; 10 synced tables
- 15,000 AI credits per user per month; priority support
Business
$45 per seat / month billed annuallyDepartmental tier adding data scale, more automation headroom and admin controls.
- Unlimited bases
- 100,000 records per base
- 100GB attachment space per base
- 100,000 automation runs per month
- 2-year revision and snapshot history; 20 synced tables
- 20,000 AI credits per user per month
Enterprise Scale
FreeOrg-wide tier with the largest limits, governance and SSO; priced by sales.
- Unlimited org units, workspaces and bases
- 500,000 records per base
- 1TB attachment space per base
- 1,000,000 automation runs per month with 3-year run history
- 3-year revision and snapshot history; 20 synced tables
- SAML/SSO, dedicated customer success manager and priority support
Funciones
Integraciones
Seguridad y cumplimiento
Pros y contras
Pros
- The same project dataset can be viewed as grid, kanban, calendar, gallery, list, timeline or Gantt, which reviewers cite as its standout advantage over single-layout PM tools
- Automations and scripting handle routine project chores (status routing, notifications, record creation) without code, and are available even on the Free plan at 100 runs per month
- Read-only collaborators, form submissions and share links are not billed on Team and Business plans, so stakeholder visibility is cheap to extend
- Deep integration surface plus a large template library, including project management, product roadmap and resource allocation starters
Contras
- Steep learning curve is the single most repeated complaint on Capterra and TrustRadius — reviewers say it is noticeably harder than the no-code marketing implies
- Per-editor seat pricing scales sharply: $20/seat/month on Team and $45/seat/month on Business when billed annually, and anyone with edit rights on any base counts
- Per-base record caps force tier jumps rather than gradual growth — 1,000 records on Free, 50,000 on Team, 100,000 on Business, 500,000 on Enterprise Scale
- It is not a full substitute for a dedicated PM tool: Gantt and timeline views require a paid plan, time tracking depends on a Marketplace extension, and reviewers note the kanban view falls short of Jira-class boards
Qué muestra el registro
Capterra shows Airtable at 4.6 out of 5 across roughly 2,240 verified reviews, the largest review base we could read directly, and TrustRadius reports a trScore of 8.5 out of 10. Across both platforms reviewers consistently praise the flexibility of views and automations while flagging a steeper learning curve than the marketing suggests, per-seat cost as contributor counts grow, and paywalled capacity.
Resumen y puntuación agregados de plataformas públicas de reseñas. Enlazamos a las reseñas originales en lugar de reproducirlas — lee la fuente antes de decidir.
Reseñas de usuarios
Escritas por cuentas de Audyense · moderadas antes de publicarse
Todavía no hay reseñas de usuarios.
¿Has usado Airtable? Sé el primero en contarles a otros compradores qué funcionó de verdad.