Audyense·
Añade tu producto
Registro lado a lado

Starnus vs. Winmo

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Winmo parte de $26 por usuario, frente a Starnus con $50.

Comparación completa

Starnusdesde $50 EUR per month (Pro)
Winmodesde $26 per month
Audyense Score44AS*Bajo34AS*Bajo
PosicionamientoAI SDR platform that runs outbound prospecting, enrichment, outreach, and follow-ups on autopilot.Winmo is a sales intelligence tool designed for marketing, advertising, and media professionals.
Plan gratuitoNoSí
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYME, Mediana empresaPYME, Mediana empresa
Planes de precio
  • Pro$50
  • Pro+$125
  • Ultra$250
  • Managed Service$900
  • Free$49
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
Identify decision-makers—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Target with precision—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Close more deals—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Early signals of reviews—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Campaign launches alerts—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Spend surges detection—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Lead generation—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichment—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Email outreach—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Prospecting Database—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integraciones verificadas—6+
Valoración agregada5.0 · 2 reviews— · No reviews yet
Integraciones
SmartleadUnipileHubSpotPerplexity
CloseMakeLinkedInFacebookTwitterAPI
Seguridad y cumplimiento—
GDPR
Pros
  • Fast automated ICP and prospect-list generation
  • Combines email and LinkedIn outreach in one flow
  • Cheaper than enterprise AI-SDR alternatives
  • Documented capability: Identify decision-makers
  • Documented capability: Target with precision
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Winmo is recommended for agencies, publishers, adtech companies, and sponsorship sellers who want to identify decision-makers, target with precision,
  • Public profile names Close, Make, LinkedIn as connected workflow surfaces
Contras
  • No independent review-platform rating found to verify real-world satisfaction
  • Credit-based limits on leads/messages per tier
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated SMBs, Mid-market audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visitar Starnus ↗Visitar Winmo ↗