Audyense·
Añade tu producto
Registro lado a lado

Starnus vs. Whova

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Starnus parte de $50 por usuario, frente a Whova con $3,000.

Comparación completa

Starnusdesde $50 EUR per month (Pro)
Whovadesde $3,000 per month
Audyense Score44AS*Bajo31AS*Bajo
PosicionamientoAI SDR platform that runs outbound prospecting, enrichment, outreach, and follow-ups on autopilot.Whova is an all-in-one event management platform designed for organizing in-person, hybrid, and virtual events.
Plan gratuitoNoSí
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYME, Mediana empresaPYME, Mediana empresa, Empresa
Planes de precio
  • Pro$50
  • Pro+$125
  • Ultra$250
  • Managed Service$900
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
Event registration—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Agenda management—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Attendee networking—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Live announcements—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Lead generation tools—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Kiosk self check-in—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Lead generation—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichment—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Marketing automation—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Crms—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integraciones verificadas—2+
Valoración agregada5.0 · 2 reviews— · No reviews yet
Integraciones
SmartleadUnipileHubSpotPerplexity
LinkedInAPI
Seguridad y cumplimiento——
Pros
  • Fast automated ICP and prospect-list generation
  • Combines email and LinkedIn outreach in one flow
  • Cheaper than enterprise AI-SDR alternatives
  • Documented capability: Event registration
  • Documented capability: Agenda management
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Whova is perfect for event organizers who want to save time managing logistics and create better experiences for attendees. Trusted by Michigan Histor
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, API as connected workflow surfaces
Contras
  • No independent review-platform rating found to verify real-world satisfaction
  • Credit-based limits on leads/messages per tier
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • The public profile names few integrations, so required connections need direct verification
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visitar Starnus ↗Visitar Whova ↗