Audyense·
Registro lado a lado

Starnus vs. Waterfall

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Starnus parte de $50 por usuario, frente a Waterfall con $149.

Comparación completa

Starnusdesde $50 EUR per month (Pro)
Waterfalldesde $149 per month
Audyense Score44AS*Bajo32AS*Bajo
PosicionamientoAI SDR platform that runs outbound prospecting, enrichment, outreach, and follow-ups on autopilot.Waterfall is a data enrichment API built for GTM and revenue teams to get accurate contact info from 30+ data sources in one place.
Plan gratuitoNo
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYME, Mediana empresaMediana empresa, Empresa
Planes de precio
  • Pro$50
  • Pro+$125
  • Ultra$250
  • Managed Service$900
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
Track job changesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Find verified emailsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Find mobile numbersDocumented in the sourced profile.
Verify emails in real-timeDocumented in the sourced profile.
Global contact coverageDocumented in the sourced profile.
Usage-based pricingDocumented in the sourced profile.
Lead generationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichmentDocumented in the sourced profile.
Visitor IdentificationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Waterfall enrichmentDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integraciones verificadas4+
Valoración agregada5.0 · 2 reviews · No reviews yet
Integraciones
SmartleadUnipileHubSpotPerplexity
SlackMakeLinkedInAPI
Seguridad y cumplimiento
Pros
  • Fast automated ICP and prospect-list generation
  • Combines email and LinkedIn outreach in one flow
  • Cheaper than enterprise AI-SDR alternatives
  • Documented capability: Track job changes
  • Documented capability: Find verified emails
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Waterfall is recommended for GTM and revenue leaders at top B2B companies who need one API to find prospects, verify emails, track job changes, and ge
  • Public profile names Slack, Make, LinkedIn as connected workflow surfaces
Contras
  • No independent review-platform rating found to verify real-world satisfaction
  • Credit-based limits on leads/messages per tier
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visitar Starnus ↗Visitar Waterfall ↗