Audyense·
Registro lado a lado

Starnus vs. Tray

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Tray parte de $19 por usuario, frente a Starnus con $50.

Comparación completa

Starnusdesde $50 EUR per month (Pro)
Traydesde $19 per month
Audyense Score44AS*Bajo32AS*Bajo
PosicionamientoAI SDR platform that runs outbound prospecting, enrichment, outreach, and follow-ups on autopilot.Tray is an AI-ready integration platform designed to build and deploy AI agents easily.
Plan gratuitoNo
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYME, Mediana empresaMediana empresa, Empresa
Planes de precio
  • Pro$50
  • Pro+$125
  • Ultra$250
  • Managed Service$900
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
AI-ready integration platformDocumented in the sourced profile.
Build and deploy agentsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Pre-built agent acceleratorsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Low-code AI automation builderDocumented in the sourced profile.
Secure AI data handlingDocumented in the sourced profile.
Scalable governance and complianceDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Api Connector AgentsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Checkout OptimizationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integraciones verificadas5+
Valoración agregada5.0 · 2 reviews · No reviews yet
Integraciones
SmartleadUnipileHubSpotPerplexity
SlackMakeLinkedInFacebookAPI
Seguridad y cumplimiento
Pros
  • Fast automated ICP and prospect-list generation
  • Combines email and LinkedIn outreach in one flow
  • Cheaper than enterprise AI-SDR alternatives
  • Documented capability: AI-ready integration platform
  • Documented capability: Build and deploy agents
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Tray is perfect for teams that want to quickly build and use AI agents without complexity, especially if you work with Slack, web apps, or APIs. Compa
  • Public profile names Slack, Make, LinkedIn as connected workflow surfaces
Contras
  • No independent review-platform rating found to verify real-world satisfaction
  • Credit-based limits on leads/messages per tier
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visitar Starnus ↗Visitar Tray ↗