Audyense·
Añade tu producto
Registro lado a lado

Starnus vs. Tavus

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Tavus parte de $20 por usuario, frente a Starnus con $50.

Comparación completa

Starnusdesde $50 EUR per month (Pro)
Tavusdesde $20 per month
Audyense Score44AS*Bajo31AS*Bajo
PosicionamientoAI SDR platform that runs outbound prospecting, enrichment, outreach, and follow-ups on autopilot.Tavus is an AI tool designed for human-like interactions using chat, voice, and face-to-face video.
Plan gratuitoNoSí
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYME, Mediana empresaStartup, Mediana empresa, Empresa
Planes de precio
  • Pro$50
  • Pro+$125
  • Ultra$250
  • Managed Service$900
  • Free$15
  • Enterprise$18
  • AdvancedCustom pricing
  • Plus$20
See—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
hear—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
and understand users—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Face-to-face video chat—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Proactive and adaptive AI—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Remembers and evolves with you—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Acts on your behalf—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Multimodal seamless conversations—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai Video Prospecting—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Video Outreach—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integraciones verificadas—2+
Valoración agregada5.0 · 2 reviews— · No reviews yet
Integraciones
SmartleadUnipileHubSpotPerplexity
LinkedInAPI
Seguridad y cumplimiento——
Pros
  • Fast automated ICP and prospect-list generation
  • Combines email and LinkedIn outreach in one flow
  • Cheaper than enterprise AI-SDR alternatives
  • Documented capability: See
  • Documented capability: hear
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Tavus is recommended for people who want a personal AI that can see, hear, and remember like a friend or intern. It’s great for companies and develope
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, API as connected workflow surfaces
Contras
  • No independent review-platform rating found to verify real-world satisfaction
  • Credit-based limits on leads/messages per tier
  • Pricing and usage limits should be rechecked before purchase
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • The public profile names few integrations, so required connections need direct verification
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visitar Starnus ↗Visitar Tavus ↗