Registro lado a lado

LooperTask vs. Trello

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

LooperTask parte de Free por usuario, frente a Trello con $10.

Comparación completa

	LooperTaskdesde Free	Trellodesde $10 per month
Audyense Score	33AS*Bajo	29AS*Bajo
Posicionamiento	The kanban board your AI coding agents actually work	Trello is a project management application that utilizes Kanban boards (which represent projects), cards (which represent tasks), and lists (which can be used to track the statuses
Plan gratuito	Sí	Sí
Implementación	Nube / SaaS	Nube / SaaS
Mejor encaje	Startup, PYME, Mediana empresa, Empresa	Startup, PYME, Mediana empresa
Planes de precio	FreeFree Solo$9 Team$11	Free or entry planFree Higher tiersCustom pricing
Free or zero pricing for the basic service	—	SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Quick overview on front and back of cards	—	SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Easy organization with tags	—	SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
labels	—	SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
and categories	—	SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Drag and drop functionality	—	SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
In-line editing	—	SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Real-time sync	—	SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Checklists	—	SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
with a progress meter	—	SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Easy uploading of files and attachments	—	SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Data filtering	—	SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Archiving of card records (e.g.	—	SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
comments and changes)	—	SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Integraciones verificadas	5+	—
Valoración agregada	— · No reviews yet	9.4 · No reviews yet
Integraciones	Claude CodeCursorWindsurfClineAny MCP-compatible client (Model Context Protocol)	—
Seguridad y cumplimiento	GDPR	—
Pros	Agents pull work themselves over MCP — no copy-pasting tickets into a chat window Code stays on your machine; only task data reaches the board Setup is one mcp.json file, about two minutes Per-task audit log of every agent action Agent-lockable columns so agents can't auto-claim work you haven't approved Live board over server-sent events — no refreshing to see agent progress Public feedback forms turn submissions into tasks automatically Task hierarchy and dependency blocking keep agents from starting work out of order One-click workspace export — no lock-in Starts free; $9/mo solo and $11/seat/mo for teams undercuts most trackers	Independent review documents a concrete business workflow Documented capability: Free or zero pricing for the basic service Documented capability: Quick overview on front and back of cards Documented capability: Easy organization with tags Documented capability: labels
Contras	Young product with a smaller ecosystem than Jira, Linear or Asana No native GitHub, Slack or CI integrations yet — everything goes through MCP Free tier is capped at 1 user, 1 project and 100 MB storage No self-hosted or on-premise option No SOC 2 or ISO 27001 attestation yet, which can block enterprise procurement Value depends on your team already using MCP-capable AI clients Agents need a machine that's actually running — nothing progresses while your laptop is closed	Pricing and usage limits should be checked against the exact plan Implementation effort depends on the team's data and process maturity Reported outcomes should be validated with the buyer's own data
	Visitar LooperTask ↗	Visitar Trello ↗