Audyense·
Añade tu producto
Registro lado a lado

Heroku vs. Smartbear BugSnag

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Heroku parte de $5 por usuario, frente a Smartbear BugSnag con $65. Smartbear BugSnag tiene la valoración agregada más alta (9.7/5 frente a 4.3/5).

Comparación completa

Herokudesde $5 per month
Smartbear BugSnagdesde $65 per month
Audyense Score25AS*Bajo29AS*Bajo
PosicionamientoHeroku set the template for modern platform-as-a-service: push to git and your app deploys, with scaling and add-ons handled for you.Smartbear BugSnag is an intuitive error monitoring system that tracks bugs and the performance of mobile, server, and web applications.
Plan gratuitoNoSí
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYME, Mediana empresaStartup, PYME, Mediana empresa
Planes de precio
  • Starting plan$5
  • Higher tiersCustom pricing
  • Free or entry planFree
  • Higher tiersCustom pricing
Editorially noted strength: Very simple Mature add-on ecosystemSíDocumented in the Softwares.com editorial review.—
Editorially noted strength: getting an app live fast with minimal infrastructure work and proven add-ons.SíDocumented in the Softwares.com editorial review.—
Web hostingSíDocumented in the Softwares.com editorial review.—
WebSíDocumented in the Softwares.com editorial review.—
APISíDocumented in the Softwares.com editorial review.—
CloudSíDocumented in the Softwares.com editorial review.—
Full stack monitoring—SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Error inbox—SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
End-to-end diagnostics—SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Two-way issue tracker—SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Application health measurement—SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Automatic notifications—SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
SAML single sign-on—SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Advanced search & segmentation with custom filters—SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Automatic error prioritization—SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Advanced user roles and permissions—SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Features dashboard—SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Customizable error views and insights—SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
User audit logs—SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Automatic user provisioning via SSO.—SíDocumented in the independently researched profile.
Integraciones verificadas——
Valoración agregada4.3 · No reviews yet9.7 · No reviews yet
Integraciones——
Seguridad y cumplimiento——
Pros
  • Editorial review documents a concrete business workflow
  • Editorially noted strength: Very simple Mature add-on ecosystem
  • Editorially noted strength: getting an app live fast with minimal infrastructure work and proven add-ons.
  • Web hosting
  • Independent review documents a concrete business workflow
  • Documented capability: Full stack monitoring
  • Documented capability: Error inbox
  • Documented capability: End-to-end diagnostics
  • Documented capability: Two-way issue tracker
Contras
  • No free tier anymore Pricey at scale
  • price at scale and the loss of any free option.
  • Choose it for prototypes and small production apps where developer time costs more than hosting.
  • Cost-sensitive teams should compare Render or Railway first.
  • Pricing and usage limits should be checked against the exact plan
  • Implementation effort depends on the team's data and process maturity
  • Reported outcomes should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visitar Heroku ↗Visitar Smartbear BugSnag ↗