Audyense·
Añade tu producto
Registro lado a lado

Fathom vs. Whova

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Fathom parte de $15 por usuario, frente a Whova con $3,000.

Comparación completa

Fathomdesde $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Whovadesde $3,000 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Sólido31AS*Bajo
PosicionamientoFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetWhova is an all-in-one event management platform designed for organizing in-person, hybrid, and virtual events.
Plan gratuitoSíSí
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYME, Mediana empresaPYME, Mediana empresa, Empresa
Planes de precio
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
Event registration—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Agenda management—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Attendee networking—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Live announcements—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Lead generation tools—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Kiosk self check-in—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Lead generation—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichment—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Marketing automation—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Crms—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integraciones verificadas—2+
Valoración agregada5.0 · 6.9k reviews— · No reviews yet
Integraciones
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
LinkedInAPI
Seguridad y cumplimiento
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
—
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Event registration
  • Documented capability: Agenda management
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Whova is perfect for event organizers who want to save time managing logistics and create better experiences for attendees. Trusted by Michigan Histor
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, API as connected workflow surfaces
Contras
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • The public profile names few integrations, so required connections need direct verification
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visitar Fathom ↗Visitar Whova ↗