Audyense·
Registro lado a lado

Fathom vs. Userlytics

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Fathom parte de $15 por usuario, frente a Userlytics con $34.

Comparación completa

Fathomdesde $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Userlyticsdesde $34 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Sólido32AS*Bajo
PosicionamientoFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetUserlytics is a UX research platform designed to test ideas and validate designs.
Plan gratuito
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYME, Mediana empresaStartup, PYME, Mediana empresa, Empresa
Planes de precio
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • BasicCustom pricing
  • Premium$34
  • Enterprise$15
Test ideas effectivelyDocumented in the sourced profile.
Validate designs easilyDocumented in the sourced profile.
Uncover hidden friction pointsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Access global user panelsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Receive expert supportDocumented in the sourced profile.
Optimize digital experiencesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichmentDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Account researchDocumented in the sourced profile.
Live Data SourcesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integraciones verificadas5+
Valoración agregada5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integraciones
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
LinkedInFacebookInstagramAirtableAPI
Seguridad y cumplimiento
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Test ideas effectively
  • Documented capability: Validate designs easily
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Userlytics is recommended for teams who want to test ideas, validate designs, and find hidden problems in digital experiences. It helps businesses get
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram as connected workflow surfaces
Contras
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visitar Fathom ↗Visitar Userlytics ↗