Audyense·
Registro lado a lado

Fathom vs. Spiky

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Fathom parte de $15 por usuario, frente a Spiky con $26.

Comparación completa

Fathomdesde $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Spikydesde $26 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Sólido33AS*Bajo
PosicionamientoFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetSpiky.ai is a sales and customer success tool designed to identify and scale winning behaviors across teams.
Plan gratuito
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYME, Mediana empresaPYME, Mediana empresa, Empresa
Planes de precio
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • BasicCustom pricing
  • Premium$40
  • Enterprise$26
Real-time feedbackDocumented in the sourced profile.
Better playbook adoptionDocumented in the sourced profile.
Pipeline visibilityDocumented in the sourced profile.
Personalized coachingDocumented in the sourced profile.
Enhanced automationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Operational efficiencyDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichmentDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Conversation intelligenceDocumented in the sourced profile.
AI sales coachingDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integraciones verificadas9+
Valoración agregada5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integraciones
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
SalesforceHubSpotPipedriveCloseSlackMake+3 más
Seguridad y cumplimiento
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Real-time feedback
  • Documented capability: Better playbook adoption
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Spiky is for sales and customer success teams who want to boost revenue by scaling winning behaviors and get real-time insights to improve their perfo
  • Public profile names Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive as connected workflow surfaces
Contras
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visitar Fathom ↗Visitar Spiky ↗