Audyense·
Registro lado a lado

Fathom vs. Spendbase

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Spendbase parte de Free por usuario, frente a Fathom con $15.

Comparación completa

Fathomdesde $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Spendbasedesde Free
Audyense Score76AS*Sólido31AS*Bajo
PosicionamientoFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetSpendbase is a spend management platform designed to help teams save on SaaS and cloud expenses.
Plan gratuito
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYME, Mediana empresaStartup, PYME, Mediana empresa, Empresa
Planes de precio
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing
  • TeamCustom pricing
  • CoreCustom pricing
Full visibility of team spendDocumented in the sourced profile.
Receive cashback on transactionsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Optimize software budgetDocumented in the sourced profile.
Issue virtual cardsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Manage SaaS apps and vendorsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Automated procurement workflowsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Sales engagementDocumented in the sourced profile.
Account researchDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integraciones verificadas2+
Valoración agregada5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integraciones
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
LinkedInAPI
Seguridad y cumplimiento
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Full visibility of team spend
  • Documented capability: Receive cashback on transactions
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Spendbase is recommended for companies looking to save on SaaS and cloud costs by gaining full visibility of team spend, getting cashback on transacti
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, API as connected workflow surfaces
Contras
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • The public profile names few integrations, so required connections need direct verification
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visitar Fathom ↗Visitar Spendbase ↗