Audyense·
Registro lado a lado

Fathom vs. SlideCamp

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Fathom parte de $15 por usuario, frente a SlideCamp con $15.

Comparación completa

Fathomdesde $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
SlideCampdesde $15 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Sólido31AS*Bajo
PosicionamientoFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetSlideCamp is a slide library tool built to simplify presentation creation and management directly inside PowerPoint.
Plan gratuito
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYME, Mediana empresaStartup, PYME, Mediana empresa, Empresa
Planes de precio
  • Team$15
  • Free$15
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
Built into PowerPointDocumented in the sourced profile.
Search inside slidesDocumented in the sourced profile.
1-click slide updatesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Real-time alertsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Stay on brandDocumented in the sourced profile.
Faster deck creationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automationDocumented in the sourced profile.
DemoDocumented in the sourced profile.
ProposalsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integraciones verificadas2+
Valoración agregada5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integraciones
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
LinkedInAPI
Seguridad y cumplimiento
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Built into PowerPoint
  • Documented capability: Search inside slides
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: SlideCamp is perfect for teams who want to create presentations faster and stay on brand. NewEdge Capital Group loves using it because it works direct
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, API as connected workflow surfaces
Contras
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • The public profile names few integrations, so required connections need direct verification
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visitar Fathom ↗Visitar SlideCamp ↗