Audyense·
Registro lado a lado

Fathom vs. Pitch

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Fathom parte de $15 por usuario, frente a Pitch con $20.

Comparación completa

Fathomdesde $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Pitchdesde $20 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Sólido32AS*Bajo
PosicionamientoFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetPitch.Link is a digital sales tool designed for trade shows, events, and remote selling.
Plan gratuito
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYME, Mediana empresaStartup, PYME, Mediana empresa
Planes de precio
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • GrowthCustom pricing
Remote selling with integrated contentDocumented in the sourced profile.
Personalize stories with video and audioDocumented in the sourced profile.
Multi-format rich media narrativesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Inbuilt analytics for buyer intentDocumented in the sourced profile.
Asynchronous one-on-one communicationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Campaign-driven personal dialoguesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Email outreachDocumented in the sourced profile.
Audience targetingDocumented in the sourced profile.
Marketing automationDocumented in the sourced profile.
ProposalsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integraciones verificadas3+
Valoración agregada5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integraciones
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
LinkedInTwitterAPI
Seguridad y cumplimiento
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Remote selling with integrated content
  • Documented capability: Personalize stories with video and audio
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: PitchLink is recommended for sales teams and marketers wanting to engage prospects better with rich media stories, personalize pitches at scale, and i
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, Twitter, API as connected workflow surfaces
Contras
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs, Mid-market audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visitar Fathom ↗Visitar Pitch ↗