Audyense·
Registro lado a lado

Fathom vs. Pega

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Fathom parte de $15 por usuario, frente a Pega con $149.

Comparación completa

Fathomdesde $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Pegadesde $149 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Sólido33AS*Bajo
PosicionamientoFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetPega is an AI-powered platform designed for enterprise transformation.
Plan gratuito
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYME, Mediana empresaMediana empresa, Empresa
Planes de precio
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
AI-powered enterprise transformation platformDocumented in the sourced profile.
Automate workflowsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Personalize customer engagementDocumented in the sourced profile.
Modernize legacy systemsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Design agents for innovationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Streamline operationsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichmentDocumented in the sourced profile.
Email outreachDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Account researchDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integraciones verificadas6+
Valoración agregada5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integraciones
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
MakeLinkedInFacebookTwitterAirtableAPI
Seguridad y cumplimiento
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: AI-powered enterprise transformation platform
  • Documented capability: Automate workflows
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Pega is recommended for organizations that want to automate workflows, personalize customer experiences, and modernize legacy systems. Companies like
  • Public profile names Make, LinkedIn, Facebook as connected workflow surfaces
Contras
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visitar Fathom ↗Visitar Pega ↗