Audyense·
Añade tu producto
Registro lado a lado

Fathom vs. Nylas

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Nylas parte de $5 por usuario, frente a Fathom con $15.

Comparación completa

Fathomdesde $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Nylasdesde $5 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Sólido32AS*Bajo
PosicionamientoFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetNylas is a developer-first API platform designed to simplify integration with email, calendar, contacts, and meeting providers.
Plan gratuitoSíSí
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYME, Mediana empresaStartup, PYME, Mediana empresa, Empresa
Planes de precio
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • BasicCustom pricing
  • BusinessCustom pricing
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing
Integrate email—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
calendar—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
meetings—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Send email on behalf of user—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Manage calendars and events—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Create and sync contacts—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Embed scheduler component—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Invite AI notetaker to meetings—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichment—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Email outreach—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integraciones verificadas—4+
Valoración agregada5.0 · 6.9k reviews— · No reviews yet
Integraciones
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
GmailLinkedInTwitterAPI
Seguridad y cumplimiento
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
—
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Integrate email
  • Documented capability: calendar
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Nylas is recommended for developers who want to quickly integrate email, calendar, and meetings from providers like Gmail and Microsoft into their app
  • Public profile names Gmail, LinkedIn, Twitter as connected workflow surfaces
Contras
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visitar Fathom ↗Visitar Nylas ↗