Audyense·
Registro lado a lado

Fathom vs. nRev

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Fathom parte de $15 por usuario, frente a nRev con $149.

Comparación completa

Fathomdesde $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
nRevdesde $149 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Sólido32AS*Bajo
PosicionamientoFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetnRev AI is a powerful AI tool designed for GTM (Go-To-Market) teams and RevOps leaders.
Plan gratuito
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYME, Mediana empresaPYME, Mediana empresa, Empresa
Planes de precio
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • GrowthCustom pricing
Autonomous GTM AI engineerDocumented in the sourced profile.
Find leads matching ICPDocumented in the sourced profile.
Automate outreach and engagementDocumented in the sourced profile.
Enrich and score leads instantlyDocumented in the sourced profile.
Track competitor launches and alertsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Keep CRM clean and optimizedDocumented in the sourced profile.
Find leadsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichmentDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automationDocumented in the sourced profile.
AI automationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integraciones verificadas5+
Valoración agregada5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integraciones
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
CloseZapierMakeLinkedInAPI
Seguridad y cumplimiento
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Autonomous GTM AI engineer
  • Documented capability: Find leads matching ICP
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: nRev AI is recommended for RevOps teams and GTM leaders who want to automate workflows and unify GTM data without needing developers. Companies like M
  • Public profile names Close, Zapier, Make as connected workflow surfaces
Contras
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visitar Fathom ↗Visitar nRev ↗