Audyense·
Añade tu producto
Registro lado a lado

Fathom vs. Introhive

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Fathom parte de $15 por usuario, frente a Introhive con $49.

Comparación completa

Fathomdesde $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Introhivedesde $49 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Sólido32AS*Bajo
PosicionamientoFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetIntrohive is a Relationship Intelligence platform designed for sales-driven B2B firms.
Plan gratuitoSíSí
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYME, Mediana empresaMediana empresa, Empresa
Planes de precio
  • Team$15
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • GrowthCustom pricing
Activate relationships—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Foster collaboration—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Drive growth—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Automate data entry—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ensure data accuracy—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Monitor job changes—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichment—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Marketing automation—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai Lead Management—SíDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integraciones verificadas—4+
Valoración agregada5.0 · 6.9k reviews— · No reviews yet
Integraciones
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
LinkedInFacebookTwitterAPI
Seguridad y cumplimiento
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
—
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Activate relationships
  • Documented capability: Foster collaboration
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Introhive is recommended for sales-focused B2B firms like legal, accounting, and consulting that want to turn their client data into actionable Relati
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter as connected workflow surfaces
Contras
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visitar Fathom ↗Visitar Introhive ↗
Fathom vs. Introhive · Audyense