Audyense·
Registro lado a lado

Fathom vs. Goodmeetings

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Goodmeetings parte de $14 por usuario, frente a Fathom con $15.

Comparación completa

Fathomdesde $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Goodmeetingsdesde $14 per month
Audyense Score76AS*Sólido32AS*Bajo
PosicionamientoFree AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google MeetGoodmeetings is an AI-powered platform designed to boost sales team performance by automating meeting tasks.
Plan gratuito
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYME, Mediana empresaStartup, PYME
Planes de precio
  • Team$15
  • Free$10
  • BasicCustom pricing
  • StarterFree
  • ProfessionalCustom pricing
Capture meeting intelDocumented in the sourced profile.
Call recordingDocumented in the sourced profile.
AI-generated key momentsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Human-level summariesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Deep CRM integrationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Real-time natural language queriesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Conversation intelligenceDocumented in the sourced profile.
AI meeting notesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Ai Meeting RecordersDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integraciones verificadas4+
Valoración agregada5.0 · 6.9k reviews · No reviews yet
Integraciones
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
CloseLinkedInTwitterAPI
Seguridad y cumplimiento
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
  • Documented capability: Capture meeting intel
  • Documented capability: Call recording
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Goodmeetings is recommended for sales teams and reps who want to supercharge productivity, close deals faster, and remove mundane tasks. It’s ideal fo
  • Public profile names Close, LinkedIn, Twitter as connected workflow surfaces
Contras
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
Visitar Fathom ↗Visitar Goodmeetings ↗