Audyense·
Registro lado a lado

Ezoic vs. Fathom

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Fathom parte de $15 por usuario, frente a Ezoic con $69.

Comparación completa

Ezoicdesde $69 per month
Fathomdesde $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Audyense Score32AS*Bajo76AS*Sólido
PosicionamientoEzoic is a web monetization platform designed for websites, apps, and digital content creators.Free AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet
Plan gratuito
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYME, Mediana empresaStartup, PYME, Mediana empresa
Planes de precio
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
  • Team$15
DisplayDocumented in the sourced profile.
videoDocumented in the sourced profile.
rewarded adsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Easy first-party data integrationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Intelligent ad managementDocumented in the sourced profile.
Premium partnerships and dealsDocumented in the sourced profile.
AI bid floor optimizationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichmentDocumented in the sourced profile.
Visitor IdentificationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Programmatic Ad AutomationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integraciones verificadas4+
Valoración agregada · No reviews yet5.0 · 6.9k reviews
Integraciones
LinkedInGoogle AdsFacebookAPI
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
Seguridad y cumplimiento
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Documented capability: Display
  • Documented capability: video
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Ezoic is recommended for website owners, app developers, and content creators who want to boost revenue with easy ad management and first-party data s
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, Google Ads, Facebook as connected workflow surfaces
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
Contras
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs, Mid-market audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
Visitar Ezoic ↗Visitar Fathom ↗