Audyense·
Registro lado a lado

DemandScience vs. Fathom

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Fathom parte de $15 por usuario, frente a DemandScience con $49.

Comparación completa

DemandSciencedesde $49 per month
Fathomdesde $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Audyense Score32AS*Bajo76AS*Sólido
PosicionamientoDemandScience is a marketing tool designed to turn random marketing efforts into predictable sales pipeline growth.Free AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet
Plan gratuito
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeMediana empresa, EmpresaStartup, PYME, Mediana empresa
Planes de precio
  • FreeFree
  • BasicCustom pricing
  • StarterFree
  • GrowthCustom pricing
  • Team$15
Verified buyer signalsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Resonant multi-channel targetingDocumented in the sourced profile.
Effortless campaign orchestrationDocumented in the sourced profile.
AI plus expert optimizationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Clean enriched data activationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Measurable pipeline and outcomesDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichmentDocumented in the sourced profile.
Email outreachDocumented in the sourced profile.
Audience targetingDocumented in the sourced profile.
Marketing automationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integraciones verificadas4+
Valoración agregada · No reviews yet5.0 · 6.9k reviews
Integraciones
LinkedInFacebookTwitterAPI
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
Seguridad y cumplimiento
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Documented capability: Verified buyer signals
  • Documented capability: Resonant multi-channel targeting
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: DemandScience is recommended for marketing teams at companies who want predictable pipeline growth and measurable outcomes. It helps turn marketing fr
  • Public profile names LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter as connected workflow surfaces
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
Contras
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
Visitar DemandScience ↗Visitar Fathom ↗