Audyense·
Registro lado a lado

DeckLinks vs. Fathom

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Fathom parte de $15 por usuario, frente a DeckLinks con $20.

Comparación completa

DeckLinksdesde $20 per month
Fathomdesde $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Audyense Score32AS*Bajo76AS*Sólido
PosicionamientoDeckLinks is a practical tool for enhancing PDF presentations and documents.Free AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet
Plan gratuito
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYME, Mediana empresa, EmpresaStartup, PYME, Mediana empresa
Planes de precio
  • Free$12
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
  • Team$15
Document tracking for viewer engagementDocumented in the sourced profile.
Video narrations enhance information clarityDocumented in the sourced profile.
On-screen recorder embeds videosDocumented in the sourced profile.
Custom call-to-action buttonsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Secure sharing with password controlDocumented in the sourced profile.
Real-time engagement analyticsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Video OutreachDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integraciones verificadas5+
Valoración agregada · No reviews yet5.0 · 6.9k reviews
Integraciones
HubSpotCloseLinkedInTwitterAPI
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
Seguridad y cumplimiento
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Documented capability: Document tracking for viewer engagement
  • Documented capability: Video narrations enhance information clarity
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: DeckLinks is perfect for sales, marketing, training, and communications teams who want to share engaging PDFs with video narrations, track viewer enga
  • Public profile names HubSpot, Close, LinkedIn as connected workflow surfaces
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
Contras
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
Visitar DeckLinks ↗Visitar Fathom ↗