Audyense·
Añade tu producto
Registro lado a lado

Craft.io vs. Wondershare Mockitt

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Wondershare Mockitt parte de Free por usuario, frente a Craft.io con $19. Craft.io tiene la valoración agregada más alta (4.5/5 frente a 4.5/5). Craft.io lista más integraciones (18+ frente a 10+).

Comparación completa

Craft.iodesde $19 per editor / month billed annually
Wondershare Mockittdesde Free
Audyense Score55AS*Aceptable60ASAceptable
PosicionamientoEnd-to-end product management with roadmaps, prioritization, feedback, and capacity planning.Browser-based UX design and prototyping platform for building and sharing interactive prototypes
Plan gratuitoNoSí
ImplementaciónNube / SaaS, HíbridoNube / SaaS
Mejor encajePYME, Mediana empresa, EmpresaPYME, Mediana empresa
Planes de precio
  • Starter$19
  • Pro$79
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing
  • Starter (Free)Free
  • Professional$8
  • Enterprise$12
SSOSíEnterprise feature.—
Backlog managementSí—
Prioritization frameworksSíIncludes RICE, MoSCoW, WSJF, and others.—
Capacity planningSíAvailable on Pro and above.—
Product roadmapsSí—
Feedback portalSíAvailable on Pro and above.—
Two-way development syncSí—
Product portfolio managementSíEnterprise feature.—
AI features—SíAI Prototype and AI Chat, powered by OpenAI/ChatGPT and added in 2023, generate interactive prototypes and design suggestions from text prompts.
Public API—NoVendor and third-party reviews confirm there is no public API for building custom third-party integrations.
Mobile app—SíNative apps available for iOS and Android in addition to Windows, Mac, and Linux desktop apps.
Whiteboarding & diagramming—ParcialNo dedicated open whiteboard canvas, but built-in mind-mapping and flowchart tools cover adjacent brainstorming and diagramming needs.
Product roadmapping—NoMockitt is a UX prototyping tool; no roadmap or backlog-planning capability appears in its feature set or reviews.
Prototyping—SíCore feature: clickable, animated interactive prototypes built from 500+ built-in widgets and templates.
Design systems / component libraries—ParcialOffers reusable design components, but reviewers describe its design-system depth as more limited than dedicated tools like Figma.
Real-time collaboration—SíMultiple reviewers cite real-time multi-user co-editing and commenting as a standout strength, though some note it is less refined than dedicated collaboration platforms.
Templates library—SíLarge built-in template and widget library is repeatedly cited by reviewers as a key strength for speeding up design work.
Version history—ParcialVersion history is available for project recovery, but reviewers describe its version-control depth as less refined than dedicated design-collaboration tools.
Integraciones verificadas18+10+
Valoración agregada4.5 · 79 reviews4.5 · 16 reviews
Integraciones
JiraAzure DevOpsGitHubGitLabPivotalFigma+9 más
SlackJiraTrelloSketchFigmaAxure+4 más
Seguridad y cumplimiento——
Pros
  • Roadmaps, backlogs, strategy, feedback, and delivery links in one product workspace.
  • Two-way sync with major development tools and integrations with design tools.
  • Unlimited contributors make stakeholder participation easier to budget.
  • Built-in prioritization frameworks and capacity planning reduce spreadsheet work.
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop interface with fast onboarding, letting non-designers create interactive prototypes with little training
  • Strong real-time collaboration so teams can co-edit and comment on the same project
  • Large built-in library of templates and 500+ UI widgets that speeds up common design tasks
  • Accessible pricing with a usable free tier for individuals
Contras
  • The per-editor pricing model can become expensive for larger product organizations.
  • Advanced portfolio management and on-premises integrations are enterprise-only.
  • Reviewers report integration friction and a learning curve for deeper configuration.
  • The product can overlap with existing roadmapping, feedback, and project tools.
  • Advanced users find integrations and design-system features limited compared to competitors like Figma
  • Performance issues reported on very large, complex projects
  • Limited offline functionality, requiring a stable internet connection
  • No public API for building custom third-party integrations
Visitar Craft.io ↗Visitar Wondershare Mockitt ↗