Audyense·
Registro lado a lado

Craft.io vs. Luna AI

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Craft.io parte de $19 por usuario, frente a Luna AI con $39. Luna AI tiene la valoración agregada más alta (4.9/5 frente a 4.5/5). Craft.io lista más integraciones (18+ frente a 11+).

Comparación completa

Craft.iodesde $19 per editor / month billed annually
Luna AIdesde $39 per maker/month (annual billing; $49 billed monthly)
Audyense Score55AS*Aceptable65ASAceptable
PosicionamientoEnd-to-end product management with roadmaps, prioritization, feedback, and capacity planning.AI Program Manager that turns Jira and Slack activity into goal, risk, and ROI visibility for product and engineering leaders
Plan gratuitoNo
ImplementaciónNube / SaaS, HíbridoNube / SaaS
Mejor encajePYME, Mediana empresa, EmpresaStartup, PYME, Mediana empresa, Empresa
Planes de precio
  • Starter$19
  • Pro$79
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing
  • FreeFree
  • Launch$39
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing
SSOEnterprise feature.
Backlog management
Prioritization frameworksIncludes RICE, MoSCoW, WSJF, and others.
Capacity planningAvailable on Pro and above.
Product roadmaps
Feedback portalAvailable on Pro and above.
Two-way development sync
Product portfolio managementEnterprise feature.
AI featuresCore product: AI-generated OKRs, roadmaps, Jira/sprint summaries, risk detection, stakeholder updates
Public APINoNo public developer API/docs found; only CSV/Sheets/Excel export
Mobile appNoNo iOS/Android app found; web-based product only
Whiteboarding & diagrammingNoNot a design tool; no whiteboarding canvas offered
Product roadmappingCentral feature: AI-generated roadmaps with capacity planning, multiple views, cost/ROI tracking
PrototypingNoNo prototyping capability; outputs are text/roadmap artifacts
Design systems / component librariesNoNo design-system tooling; product is focused on PM reporting
Real-time collaborationParcialMultiple makers share/edit roadmaps and sync comments via Slack, but no confirmed live co-editing/cursors
Templates libraryFree tier includes 3 custom templates; paid Launch tier adds unlimited custom templates plus public template access
Version historyNoNo version-history feature advertised
Integraciones verificadas18+11+
Valoración agregada4.5 · 79 reviews4.9 · 42 reviews
Integraciones
JiraAzure DevOpsGitHubGitLabPivotalFigma+9 más
JiraSlackAsanaClickUpGmailOutlook+5 más
Seguridad y cumplimiento
Pros
  • Roadmaps, backlogs, strategy, feedback, and delivery links in one product workspace.
  • Two-way sync with major development tools and integrations with design tools.
  • Unlimited contributors make stakeholder participation easier to budget.
  • Built-in prioritization frameworks and capacity planning reduce spreadsheet work.
  • Two-way Jira/Slack sync keeps status updates current with minimal manual copy-pasting
  • Turns messy Jira sprint data into clear progress, risk, and recommendation summaries in one click
  • Customizable, shareable roadmap views make stakeholder alignment easier
  • Saves reported hours per week previously spent compiling manual status reports
Contras
  • The per-editor pricing model can become expensive for larger product organizations.
  • Advanced portfolio management and on-premises integrations are enterprise-only.
  • Reviewers report integration friction and a learning curve for deeper configuration.
  • The product can overlap with existing roadmapping, feedback, and project tools.
  • Noticeable learning curve — reviewers describe it as cumbersome until you're familiar with the tool
  • Some users feel price is high relative to the number of makers/credits included at each tier
  • Feature gaps reported around deeper OKR health scoring and tighter linkage of reports to company-level goals
  • Value drops sharply for teams that don't use both Jira and Slack
Visitar Craft.io ↗Visitar Luna AI ↗