Audyense·
Registro lado a lado

Chanty vs. Fathom

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Chanty parte de $3 por usuario, frente a Fathom con $15.

Comparación completa

Chantydesde $3 per month
Fathomdesde $15 per user/month, billed annually (Team plan, 2+ users)
Audyense Score33AS*Bajo76AS*Sólido
PosicionamientoChanty is a team collaboration platform designed for messaging, video calls, and task management.Free AI notetaker for Zoom, Teams, and Google Meet
Plan gratuito
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajePYME, Mediana empresa, EmpresaStartup, PYME, Mediana empresa
Planes de precio
  • Free$3
  • BasicCustom pricing
  • Business$49
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing
  • Team$15
MessagingDocumented in the sourced profile.
video callingDocumented in the sourced profile.
Task managementDocumented in the sourced profile.
Video conferencing with screen sharingDocumented in the sourced profile.
Kanban task managementDocumented in the sourced profile.
Secure file sharingDocumented in the sourced profile.
Data enrichmentDocumented in the sourced profile.
Workflow automationDocumented in the sourced profile.
Sales Productivity ToolsDocumented in the sourced profile.
Integraciones verificadas6+
Valoración agregada · No reviews yet5.0 · 6.9k reviews
Integraciones
Google WorkspaceSlackLinkedInFacebookNotionAPI
ZoomMicrosoft TeamsGoogle MeetSlack
Seguridad y cumplimiento
SOC 2 Type IIGDPRHIPAA
Pros
  • Documented capability: Messaging
  • Documented capability: video calling
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Chanty is recommended for small to large businesses that want a secure, easy-to-use platform for messaging, video calling, and task management. Over 7
  • Public profile names Google Workspace, Slack, LinkedIn as connected workflow surfaces
  • Free plan is fully featured for unlimited recordings/transcripts
  • Very high user satisfaction and ease-of-use scores on G2
  • Deep CRM and calendar integrations, plus MCP/API access
Contras
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated SMBs, Mid-market, Enterprise audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
  • Managing multiple notetaker bots in one meeting can be clunky per reviews
Visitar Chanty ↗Visitar Fathom ↗