Registro lado a lado
Cakewalk vs. Tines
Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.
La versión corta
Cakewalk parte de Custom pricing por usuario, frente a Tines con Custom pricing.
Comparación completa
Cakewalkdesde Custom pricing | Tinesdesde Custom pricing | |
|---|---|---|
| Audyense Score | 57ASAceptable | 22AS*Bajo |
| Posicionamiento | Access Management For Your AI Agents And Humans | No-code workflow automation for security and IT teams |
| Plan gratuito | No | No |
| Implementación | Nube / SaaS | Nube / SaaS |
| Mejor encaje | PYME, Mediana empresa | Mediana empresa, Empresa |
| Planes de precio |
|
|
| Audit logs | SíGenerates granular, auditor-designed logs covering every access request/decision as a single system of record. | — |
| Compliance reporting | SíAccess-control evidence and request logs are built to support ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIS2, HIPAA, and PCI audits. | — |
| Device management | NoNo MDM/device-management capability found; product scope is application/identity access, not endpoint devices. | — |
| Multi-factor authentication | NoMFA is handled by the connected identity provider (e.g. Okta, Entra); Cakewalk itself does not enforce MFA directly. | — |
| Privileged access management | ParcialProvides credential vaulting and just-in-time, scoped token mediation for AI agent tool calls, but not full human-privileged-session PAM. | — |
| Public API | SíDedicated Open API for building custom workflows and integrations. | — |
| Role-based access control | SíRole- and attribute-based access control (RBAC/ABAC) for automated group assignment. | — |
| SCIM / directory provisioning | ParcialAuto-provisioning via direct IdP sync (Okta, Entra, Google Workspace) and 5,600+ app connectors; SCIM as a protocol not explicitly named. | — |
| Self-hosting / on-prem | NoAWS-hosted, multitenant cloud SaaS with EU-only data residency; no self-hosted option offered. | — |
| SSO / SAML | SíIntegrates with SSO identity providers including Okta, Google Workspace, and Microsoft Entra. | — |
| Visual workflow builder | — | SíBuilds workflows without traditional application code. |
| Security automation | — | SíAutomates alert, enrichment, and response processes. |
| IT automation | — | SíConnects identity, ticketing, and operational tasks. |
| API integrations | — | SíConnects any system with a usable API. |
| Webhooks | — | SíReceives and sends event-driven workflow data. |
| Approvals | — | SíAdds human checks to higher-risk automations. |
| Reusable components | — | SíStandardizes common automation patterns. |
| Audit and governance | — | SíSupports controlled, reviewable automation operations. |
| Integraciones verificadas | 15+ | — |
| Valoración agregada | 4.9 · 28 reviews | — · No reviews yet |
| Integraciones | OktaGoogle WorkspaceMicrosoft Entra IDSlackMicrosoft TeamsBambooHR+9 más | OktaMicrosoft Entra IDGoogle WorkspaceSlackMicrosoft TeamsJira+9 más |
| Seguridad y cumplimiento | GDPRISO 27001SOC 2 (audit-ready) | SOC 2ISO 27001GDPR |
| Pros |
|
|
| Contras |
|
|
| Visitar Cakewalk ↗ | Visitar Tines ↗ |