Audyense·
Añade tu producto
Registro lado a lado

Browserable vs. Starnus

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Browserable parte de $26 por usuario, frente a Starnus con $50.

Comparación completa

Browserabledesde $26 per month
Starnusdesde $50 EUR per month (Pro)
Audyense Score32AS*Bajo44AS*Bajo
PosicionamientoBrowserable is an open-source browser automation tool for AI agents.AI SDR platform that runs outbound prospecting, enrichment, outreach, and follow-ups on autopilot.
Plan gratuitoSíNo
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYMEStartup, PYME, Mediana empresa
Planes de precio
  • FreeFree
  • Basic$12
  • StarterFree
  • Professional$12
  • Pro$50
  • Pro+$125
  • Ultra$250
  • Managed Service$900
Self-hostableSíDocumented in the sourced profile.—
Open sourceSíDocumented in the sourced profile.—
Easy integrationSíDocumented in the sourced profile.—
State-of-the-art browser agentSíDocumented in the sourced profile.—
Build browser agentsSíDocumented in the sourced profile.—
Extract information efficientlySíDocumented in the sourced profile.—
Ai Agent BuildersSíDocumented in the sourced profile.—
Browser Automation ToolsSíDocumented in the sourced profile.—
Integraciones verificadas3+—
Valoración agregada— · No reviews yet5.0 · 2 reviews
Integraciones
MakeLinkedInAPI
SmartleadUnipileHubSpotPerplexity
Seguridad y cumplimiento——
Pros
  • Documented capability: Self-hostable
  • Documented capability: Open source
  • Profile names a concrete ICP: Browserable is recommended for developers who want to build browser agents that can navigate sites, fill out forms, and extract information easily. It
  • Public profile names Make, LinkedIn, API as connected workflow surfaces
  • Fast automated ICP and prospect-list generation
  • Combines email and LinkedIn outreach in one flow
  • Cheaper than enterprise AI-SDR alternatives
Contras
  • Some pricing or higher-tier terms are not publicly itemized
  • Fit is strongest for the stated Startups, SMBs audience rather than every team
  • Named integrations should be validated against the team's exact plan and workflow
  • Reported outcomes and vendor claims should be validated with the buyer's own data
  • No independent review-platform rating found to verify real-world satisfaction
  • Credit-based limits on leads/messages per tier
Visitar Browserable ↗Visitar Starnus ↗