Audyense·
Añade tu producto
Skip to content
Registro lado a lado

BigTime vs. Teamwork.com

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Teamwork.com parte de Free por usuario, frente a BigTime con $240. BigTime tiene la valoración agregada más alta (4.6/5 frente a 4.4/5). BigTime lista más integraciones (15+ frente a 15+).

Comparación completa

BigTimedesde $240 per user/year
Teamwork.comdesde Free
Audyense Score75ASSólido78ASSólido
PosicionamientoYour financial brain behind every projectMost tools track work. We make it profitable.
Plan gratuitoNoSí
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajePYME, Mediana empresaPYME, Mediana empresa, Empresa
Planes de precio
  • Essentials$240
  • Advanced$420
  • Premier$540
  • FreeFree
  • Basics$10
  • Accelerate$25
  • OptimizeCustom pricing
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing
AI featuresSíBigTime AI assistant included from Essentials tier; markets AI-assisted time entry and forecasting.SíTeamworkAI included starting on the Basics plan for task summarization and content generation.
Gantt / timeline chartsSíProject Portfolio Management includes a Gantt view alongside grid, card, calendar views.SíNative Gantt chart project view available from the Free plan up.
Goal tracking & OKRsNoNo dedicated OKR/goal-tracking module found.ParcialNo dedicated OKR module; tracked indirectly via milestones and task lists.
Kanban boardsSíCard (Kanban) view is one of the listed project views.SíBoard (kanban) view is a core project view on all plans.
Mobile appParcialNative iOS/Android apps exist but reviewers cite reliability issues, especially Android.ParcialiOS/Android apps exist but reviewers rate mobile access below the category average.
Public APISíREST API documented at iq.bigtime.net with Projects, Clients, Tasks, Reporting endpoints.SíPublished REST API (v3) with OAuth 2.0 and Basic Auth.
Reporting & dashboardsSíStandard reports on Essentials; custom reporting center and dashboards on Advanced/Premier.SíUtilization, profitability, and performance reporting included.
Resource & capacity managementSíUtilization-based resource management and staffing tools, expanded in Premier.SíCapacity planning on Accelerate; role/skill scheduling on Optimize/Enterprise.
Task managementSíTask assignment, dependencies, and project portfolio management are core.SíCore strength of the product; rated 9.9 on TrustRadius.
Time trackingSíCore product function since founding; included in every tier.SíBillable time tracking built in from the Basics plan.
Workflow automationSíConfigurable multi-level approval workflows and automated notifications.SíTiered automation limits from 100 (Free) up to 100,000 (Optimize) monthly runs.
Integraciones verificadas15+15+
Valoración agregada4.6 · 660 reviews4.4 · 1.3k reviews
Integraciones
QuickBooks OnlineQuickBooks DesktopSage IntacctLacerteXeroNetSuite+9 más
SlackGoogle DriveDropbox BusinessMicrosoft TeamsMicrosoft OutlookGmail+9 más
Seguridad y cumplimiento
SOC 1 Type IISOC 2 Type IIGDPRDCAA compliant
ISO/IEC 27001:2013SOC 2GDPRPCI compliant+1 más
Pros
  • Users consistently praise ease of use and an intuitive interface for time tracking and project/billing management
  • Streamlines billing, invoicing, expense entry, and reporting in a single connected system
  • Responsive, knowledgeable customer support and Customer Success Managers called out repeatedly in reviews
  • Deep, well-regarded QuickBooks integration that simplifies reconciliation for accounting-driven firms
  • Deep task management with sub-tasks, dependencies, and multiple views (list, board, Gantt)
  • Built-in billing, invoicing, and profitability tracking tailored to client-services work
  • Wide integration ecosystem (150+ apps) including Slack, Google Drive, and HubSpot
  • Responsive customer support, frequently praised in reviews
Contras
  • Mobile app is frequently reported as clunky or glitchy, notably worse on Android than iOS
  • Noticeable learning curve around some of the project management features
  • Interface can feel dated and less flexible than newer, general-purpose PM tools
  • Building and running custom/default reports is difficult for some users, with occasional crashes reported
  • Steep learning curve due to the sheer number of features and settings
  • Mobile app experience rated notably weaker than desktop
  • Can feel resource-heavy and slower on large projects with many collaborators
  • Less customizable than some lighter-weight PM competitors
Visitar BigTime ↗Visitar Teamwork.com ↗

Lectura editorial de la comparación

La tabla resume los datos estructurados; esta sección explica cómo interpretar las diferencias para una decisión de compra real.

Encaje y límites de cada herramienta

BigTime

BigTime is a cloud-based professional services automation (PSA) platform that unifies time tracking, expense management, project budgeting, resource planning, and billing/invoicing for services firms. It integrates directly with accounting systems like QuickBooks and Sage Intacct.

Encaja especialmente con: Professional services firms (consulting, accounting, engineering, architecture, IT services) that bill by the hour Government contractors that need DCAA-compliant timekeeping, approvals, and audit trails Firms standardized on QuickBooks or Sage Intacct that want project financials tied directly to accounting

Puede no encajar si: Teams wanting a modern, highly flexible general-purpose project management tool for non-billable work Organizations that require a consistently polished, reliable mobile app experience

Teamwork.com

Teamwork.com is an AI-powered professional services automation (PSA) platform that combines project management, resource planning, and financial management in one system. It helps agencies and client-services teams plan, deliver, and bill client work while tracking profitability in real time.

Encaja especialmente con: Client-services agencies that need to bill and track project profitability Consulting and professional-services firms managing multiple concurrent client projects Teams that want project management, resourcing, and invoicing in one platform

Puede no encajar si: Very small teams wanting a lightweight, minimal-setup task tracker Non-billable internal teams with no need for client invoicing or profitability tracking

Precios y estructura de planes

BigTime: Precio inicial publicado $240 per user/year

  • Essentials$240 per user/year
  • Advanced$420 per user/year
  • Premier$540 per user/year

Teamwork.com: Precio inicial publicado Free

  • FreeFree
  • Basics$10 per user/month, billed yearly
  • Accelerate$25 per user/month, billed yearly
  • OptimizeCustom pricing
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing

Capacidades que conviene validar

  • BigTime: AI features, Gantt / timeline charts, Kanban boards, Mobile app, Public API Integrations include QuickBooks Online, QuickBooks Desktop, Sage Intacct, Lacerte.
  • Teamwork.com: AI features, Gantt / timeline charts, Goal tracking & OKRs, Kanban boards, Mobile app Integrations include Slack, Google Drive, Dropbox Business, Microsoft Teams.

Preguntas antes de cambiar

  • ¿El plan de BigTime incluye las funciones y límites que necesitamos?
  • ¿El plan de Teamwork.com incluye las funciones y límites que necesitamos?
  • Does the exact integration path for QuickBooks Online, QuickBooks Desktop, Sage Intacct support the sync direction, permissions, and volume we need?
  • Is a hosted-only deployment acceptable for the team and customers who will use this system?

Cómo evaluar esta lista corta

Una comparación útil convierte las diferencias de Gestión de proyectos en una prueba concreta. Usa estos pasos para evitar elegir por una tabla de funciones o por el precio más bajo.

  1. Empieza con un flujo de trabajo representativo de Gestión de proyectos, no con una lista de funciones. Define quién lo usará, qué datos entran y qué resultado debe producir.
  2. Prueba el recorrido completo con QuickBooks Online, QuickBooks Desktop, Sage Intacct: permisos, dirección de sincronización, errores y límites de volumen suelen importar más que el nombre de una integración.
  3. Compara el coste del escenario real, incluidos usuarios, uso, almacenamiento, soporte y cualquier requisito de contrato. El precio inicial por sí solo no mide el coste de adopción.
  4. Antes de cambiar, registra qué evidencia falta, pide una demostración del flujo crítico y confirma seguridad, residencia de datos, exportación y soporte con cada proveedor.

Las señales estructuradas ayudan a reducir la lista, pero una prueba con un flujo real sigue siendo la mejor forma de validar la decisión.

Base de investigación

Última comprobación: 2026-07-31. Pricing, integrations, feature support, and review signals can change, so treat this as a research snapshot and verify the final decision with the vendor.

Fuentes consultadas: BigTime product site, Capterra, G2; Teamwork.com product site, G2, Capterra