Audyense·
Añade tu producto
Skip to content
Registro lado a lado

Azure Boards vs. Visily

Elaborado a partir del registro investigado y revisado de cada herramienta. Las cifras se contrastan con las páginas públicas de precios en el momento de la investigación — confirma siempre el precio actual con el proveedor antes de comprar.

La versión corta

Azure Boards parte de Free por usuario, frente a Visily con Free. Visily tiene la valoración agregada más alta (4.8/5 frente a 4.2/5). Azure Boards lista más integraciones (14+ frente a 13+).

Comparación completa

Azure Boardsdesde Free
Visilydesde Free
Audyense Score71ASSólido64ASAceptable
PosicionamientoPlan, track, and discuss work across your teamsMake your ideas look as good as they sound.
Plan gratuitoSíSí
ImplementaciónNube / SaaSNube / SaaS
Mejor encajeStartup, PYME, Mediana empresa, EmpresaStartup, PYME, Mediana empresa
Planes de precio
  • Stakeholder (Free)Free
  • Basic$6
  • Basic + Test Plans$52
  • StarterFree
  • Pro$11
  • Business$29
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing
AI featuresParcialCopilot-assisted features exist (PR descriptions, some work-item assistance), but no dedicated AI planning featuresSíCore differentiator — text/screenshot-to-wireframe, AI deep design, diagram AI
Design systems / component librariesNoNot a design tool; no design-system management capabilityParcialWorkspace-level shared component/template/theme library (Business tier), no true design-token governance
PrototypingNoNo prototyping features; a work-tracking tool, not a design toolSíInteractive prototypes with auto-linking between screens, hi-fi/lo-fi modes
Public APISíFull REST API and client libraries, widely used for integrations and automationParcialVisily MCP server access (Pro+) for AI-agent integration; no general public REST API
Real-time collaborationParcialBoards update live for status/assignment changes and support @mentions; no simultaneous multi-cursor editingSíCursor chat, comments, follower mode, live co-editing
Product roadmappingParcialDelivery Plans provides cross-team timeline/roadmap views, more basic than dedicated roadmap productsParcialRoadmap templates and AI-generated timeline/bubble charts, but template-based, not a dedicated prioritization module
Templates librarySíBuilt-in process templates (Agile, Scrum, Basic, CMMI) and customizable work-item templatesSí1,500+ templates advertised, workspace-level libraries on higher tiers
Version historySíFull audit history on every work item, plus source-control history via linked Repos commitsSí7-day (Pro) / 30-day (Business) version history
Whiteboarding & diagrammingNoNo native whiteboard/visual collaboration canvasSíSticky notes, flowcharts/diagramming; positions partly as a Miro alternative
Mobile appParcialNo dedicated native Boards mobile app from Microsoft; third-party apps and responsive web view existNoWeb-based only; offers templates for designing mobile app UIs but no native app
Integraciones verificadas14+13+
Valoración agregada4.2 · 190 reviews4.8 · 32 reviews
Integraciones
GitHubGitHub EnterpriseMicrosoft TeamsSlackAzure PipelinesAzure Repos+8 más
FigmaNotionSlackJiraConfluenceMicrosoft Teams+7 más
Seguridad y cumplimiento
ISO 27001ISO 27018SOC 1SOC 2+2 más
—
Pros
  • Deep native integration with the Microsoft/Visual Studio ecosystem and Entra ID identity
  • Highly customizable work-item types, boards, and process templates (Agile, Scrum, CMMI)
  • Strong traceability linking work items directly to commits, pull requests, and builds
  • Generous free tier — 5 free users plus unlimited free Stakeholder seats
  • Intuitive drag-and-drop interface with a fast learning curve, accessible to non-designers
  • AI screenshot-to-wireframe and text-to-wireframe conversion speeds up early concepting
  • Real-time collaboration with cursor chat, comments, and follower mode
  • Large template and component library accelerates starting new designs
Contras
  • UI and developer ergonomics considered clunkier than GitHub, GitLab, or Jira by many reviewers
  • Steeper configuration complexity for customizing processes and boards
  • Weaker third-party plugin and marketplace ecosystem than Jira's Atlassian Marketplace
  • Feels like an add-on to Azure DevOps rather than a standalone best-in-class PM tool for teams outside Microsoft shops
  • Limited customization and design properties compared to professional tools like Figma
  • Basic prototyping, animation, and UI-kit depth compared to competitors
  • AI editing regenerates whole screens rather than making targeted changes
  • Free plan's AI credits are limiting for extended use, and free-tier exports are watermarked
Visitar Azure Boards ↗Visitar Visily ↗

Lectura editorial de la comparación

La tabla resume los datos estructurados; esta sección explica cómo interpretar las diferencias para una decisión de compra real.

Encaje y límites de cada herramienta

Azure Boards

Azure Boards is Microsoft's cloud-hosted work-tracking service within Azure DevOps Services, combining drag-and-drop sprint planning with flexible work-item tracking and end-to-end traceability from idea to release. It supports Kanban boards, Scrum boards, backlogs, and dashboards, natively linking work items to code changes, builds, and pull requests.

Encaja especialmente con: Teams already standardized on Microsoft/Azure/GitHub Enterprise and Entra ID Organizations needing tight code-to-work-item traceability across commits, PRs, and builds Teams wanting Scrum/Kanban work tracking bundled free with CI/CD and Git hosting rather than buying separately

Puede no encajar si: Teams wanting the richest third-party integration and plugin ecosystem, where Jira's Atlassian Marketplace is broader Teams prioritizing a highly polished, modern PM-tool UX over deep Microsoft-stack integration

Visily

Visily is an AI-powered UI design and wireframing tool that lets non-designers (PMs, founders, business analysts, developers) turn text prompts, screenshots, or sketches into editable wireframes and prototypes. It combines a drag-and-drop canvas, AI-assisted design generation, a large template/component library, and real-time team collaboration, positioning itself as a faster, simpler alternative to full design tools like Figma for early-stage concepting.

Encaja especialmente con: Non-designers (PMs, founders, business analysts, engineers) visualizing product ideas quickly Early-stage startups and small product teams needing fast concepting before investing in high-fidelity design Teams already using Figma downstream who want a faster front-end for early concepting

Puede no encajar si: Professional UI/UX design teams needing pixel-perfect, highly customizable design systems Teams needing a native mobile app or deep public-API/developer integrations

Precios y estructura de planes

Azure Boards: Precio inicial publicado Free

  • Stakeholder (Free)Free
  • Basic$6 per user/month (first 5 users free)
  • Basic + Test Plans$52 per user/month

Visily: Precio inicial publicado Free

  • StarterFree
  • Pro$11 per editor / month, billed annually
  • Business$29 per editor / month, billed annually
  • EnterpriseCustom pricing

Capacidades que conviene validar

  • Azure Boards: AI features, Public API, Real-time collaboration, Product roadmapping, Templates library Integrations include GitHub, GitHub Enterprise, Microsoft Teams, Slack.
  • Visily: AI features, Design systems / component libraries, Prototyping, Public API, Real-time collaboration Integrations include Figma, Notion, Slack, Jira.

Preguntas antes de cambiar

  • ¿El plan de Azure Boards incluye las funciones y límites que necesitamos?
  • ¿El plan de Visily incluye las funciones y límites que necesitamos?
  • Does the exact integration path for GitHub, GitHub Enterprise, Microsoft Teams support the sync direction, permissions, and volume we need?
  • Is a hosted-only deployment acceptable for the team and customers who will use this system?

Cómo evaluar esta lista corta

Una comparación útil convierte las diferencias de Diseño y Producto en una prueba concreta. Usa estos pasos para evitar elegir por una tabla de funciones o por el precio más bajo.

  1. Empieza con un flujo de trabajo representativo de Diseño y Producto, no con una lista de funciones. Define quién lo usará, qué datos entran y qué resultado debe producir.
  2. Prueba el recorrido completo con GitHub, GitHub Enterprise, Microsoft Teams: permisos, dirección de sincronización, errores y límites de volumen suelen importar más que el nombre de una integración.
  3. Compara el coste del escenario real, incluidos usuarios, uso, almacenamiento, soporte y cualquier requisito de contrato. El precio inicial por sí solo no mide el coste de adopción.
  4. Antes de cambiar, registra qué evidencia falta, pide una demostración del flujo crítico y confirma seguridad, residencia de datos, exportación y soporte con cada proveedor.

Las señales estructuradas ayudan a reducir la lista, pero una prueba con un flujo real sigue siendo la mejor forma de validar la decisión.

Base de investigación

Última comprobación: 2026-08-01. Pricing, integrations, feature support, and review signals can change, so treat this as a research snapshot and verify the final decision with the vendor.

Fuentes consultadas: Azure Boards product site, G2, Capterra; Visily product site, G2, Capterra